<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Safi Saad &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safisaad.com/category/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safisaad.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What the heck happened to Oprah?</title>
		<link>http://www.safisaad.com/2009/06/08/what-the-heck-happened-to-oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safisaad.com/2009/06/08/what-the-heck-happened-to-oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safisaad.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed Newsweek&#8217;s brilliant &#8220;Why Health Advice on &#8216;Oprah&#8217; Could Make You Sick&#8221; article last month, here&#8217;s an excerpt:
In 2007, Oprah invited Jenny McCarthy, the Playboy model and actress, to describe her struggle to find help for her young son. When he was 2½, Evan suffered a series of seizures. A neurologist told [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="What the heck happened to Oprah?" src="http://www.safisaad.com/images/oprah.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="160" />In case you missed Newsweek&#8217;s brilliant &#8220;Why Health Advice on &#8216;Oprah&#8217; Could Make You Sick&#8221; article last month, here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2007, Oprah invited Jenny McCarthy, the <em>Playboy</em> model and actress, to describe her struggle to find help for her young son. When he was 2½, Evan suffered a series of seizures. A neurologist told McCarthy he was autistic. &#8220;So what do you think triggered the autism?&#8221; Oprah asked McCarthy. &#8220;I know you have a theory.&#8221;</p>
<p>McCarthy is certain that her son contracted autism from the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination he received as a baby. She told Oprah that the morning he went in for his checkup, her instincts told her not to allow the doctor to give him the vaccine. &#8220;I said to the doctor, I have a very bad feeling about this shot. This is the autism shot, isn&#8217;t it? And he said no, that is ridiculous; it is a mother&#8217;s desperate attempt to blame something on autism. And he swore at me.&#8221; The nurse gave Evan the shot. &#8220;And not soon thereafter,&#8221; McCarthy said, &#8220;boom, soul gone from his eyes.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest of the article <a title="Why Health Advice on Oprah Could Make You Sick" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/200025/page/1" target="_blank">here</a>. Good for Newsweek to call out Oprah on these issues. Next to the Glenn Beck program on Fox News, this is the epitome of ignorant brainwashing. What the heck happened to Oprah?</p>
<p>::SS::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safisaad.com/2009/06/08/what-the-heck-happened-to-oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert on Charles Darwin</title>
		<link>http://www.safisaad.com/2009/02/13/roger-ebert-on-charles-darwin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safisaad.com/2009/02/13/roger-ebert-on-charles-darwin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safisaad.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of Roger Ebert&#8217;s Journal:
Darwin&#8217;s Theory has been much developed and improved by countless scientists over the years, most dramatically since the discovery of DNA&#8211;which Darwin knew nothing about, but which uncannily supported his theory and revealed the mechanism by which it works. The Theory has been called &#8220;the best theory in the history of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtesy of <a title="Roger Ebert's Journal" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert" target="_blank">Roger Ebert&#8217;s Journal</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Darwin&#8217;s Theory has been much developed and improved by countless scientists over the years, most dramatically since the discovery of DNA&#8211;which Darwin knew nothing about, but which uncannily supported his theory and revealed the mechanism by which it works. The Theory has been called &#8220;the best theory in the history of science.&#8221; Intelligent Design, on the other hand, has been described as a pseudoscience and Creationism in Science&#8217;s clothing. A federal court decision declared it a subterfuge to smuggle a religious belief into tax-supported schools.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest of his fascinating blog post <a title="Darwin Survives as the Fittest" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/darwin_survives_as_the_fittest.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>::SS::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safisaad.com/2009/02/13/roger-ebert-on-charles-darwin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert takes on Ben Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/12/03/roger-ebert-takes-on-ben-stein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/12/03/roger-ebert-takes-on-ben-stein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safisaad.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of Chicago Sun-Times:
I&#8217;ve been accused of refusing to review Ben Stein&#8217;s documentary &#8220;Expelled,&#8221; a defense of Creationism, because of my belief in the theory of evolution. Here is my response.
Ben Stein, you hosted a TV show on which you gave away money. Imagine that I have created a special edition of &#8220;Who Wants to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtesy of <a title="Chicago Sun-Times" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com" target="_blank">Chicago Sun-Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been accused of refusing to review Ben Stein&#8217;s documentary &#8220;Expelled,&#8221; a defense of Creationism, because of my belief in the theory of evolution. Here is my response.</p>
<p>Ben Stein, you hosted a TV show on which you gave away money. Imagine that I have created a special edition of &#8220;Who Wants to be a Millionaire&#8221; just for you. Ben, you&#8217;ve answered all the earlier questions correctly, and now you&#8217;re up for the $1 million prize. It involves an explanation for the evolution of life on this planet. You have already exercised your option to throw away two of the wrong answers. Now you are faced with two choices: (A) Darwin&#8217;s Theory of Evolution, or (B) Intelligent Design.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a title="Win Ben Stein's mind" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/win_ben_steins_mind.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>::SS::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/12/03/roger-ebert-takes-on-ben-stein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Einstein&#8217;s formula proven right</title>
		<link>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/11/21/einsteins-formula-proven-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/11/21/einsteins-formula-proven-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safisaad.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of Yahoo! News:
It&#8217;s taken more than a century, but Einstein&#8217;s celebrated formula e=mc2 has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.
A brainpower consortium led by Laurent Lellouch of France&#8217;s Centre for Theoretical Physics, using some of the world&#8217;s mightiest supercomputers, have set down the calculations for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtesy of <a title="Yahoo! News" href="http://news.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Yahoo! News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s taken more than a century, but Einstein&#8217;s celebrated formula e=mc2 has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.</p>
<p>A brainpower consortium led by Laurent Lellouch of France&#8217;s Centre for Theoretical Physics, using some of the world&#8217;s mightiest supercomputers, have set down the calculations for estimating the mass of protons and neutrons, the particles at the nucleus of atoms.</p>
<p>According to the conventional model of particle physics, protons and neutrons comprise smaller particles known as quarks, which in turn are bound by gluons.</p>
<p>The odd thing is this: the mass of gluons is zero and the mass of quarks is only five percent. Where, therefore, is the missing 95 percent?</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a title="e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081120/sc_afp/sciencephysicseinstein_081120235605" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>::SS::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/11/21/einsteins-formula-proven-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Bang</title>
		<link>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/11/17/the-big-bang/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/11/17/the-big-bang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safisaad.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one will exercise your brain, courtesy of Astronomy Buff:
The Big Bang was not an explosion of matter into space, rather it was an explosion of space ITSELF, and since space and time are interconnected, we really have to say it was an explosion of space AND time, or space-time.
So, the Big Bang wasn’t an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one will exercise your brain, courtesy of <a title="Astronomy Buff" href="http://www.astronomybuff.com/" target="_blank">Astronomy Buff</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Big Bang was not an explosion of matter into space, rather it was an explosion of space ITSELF, and since space and time are interconnected, we really have to say it was an explosion of space AND time, or space-time.</p>
<p>So, the Big Bang wasn’t an explosion of stuff like atoms or molecules, it was an explosion of a place and instance, it was the creation of when and where.</p>
<p>Before the Big Bang there was simply nothing, there was no ‘where’ nor was there a ‘when’. It doesn’t even make sense to say ‘before the Big Bang’.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the very interesting post <a title="The Big Bang Was an Explosion OF Space, Not IN Space" href="http://www.astronomybuff.com/the-big-bang-was-an-explosion-of-space-not-in-space/" target="_blank">here</a>. And then read it again, and again.</p>
<p>::SS::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safisaad.com/2008/11/17/the-big-bang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.179 seconds -->
